What is Past is Prologue:
Examine the first major issue Examine the second major issue Examine the third major issue Discuss your findings Restate your thesis and point beyond it Interpret the findings Provide answers, solutions, a final opinion Flesh out each section, adding subheadings as necessary, and you will create an outline.
Paradigm for "Theory" Papers If you want to advance a thesis in your paper, use this next design. Introduction Establish the problem or question Discuss its significance Provide the necessary background information Introduce experts who have addressed the problem Provide a thesis sentence that addresses the problem from Paradigm thesis fresh perspective if at all possible Body Evaluate the issues involved in the problem Develop a past-to-present examination Compare and analyze the details and minor issues Cite experts who have addressed the same problem Conclusion Advance and defend your theory as it grows out of evidence in the body Offer directives or a plan of action Suggest additional work and research that is needed Paradigm for the Analysis of Creative Works If you plan to analyze a musical, artistic, or literature work, such as an opera, a set of paintings, or a novel, adjust this next paradigm to your subject and purpose: Introduction Give a brief summary in one sentence Provide background information that relates to the thesis Offer biographical facts about the artist that relate to the specific issues Quote and paraphrase authorities to establish the scholarly tradition Write a thesis sentence that establishes your particular views of the work Body Provide evaluative analysis divided according to such elements as imagery, theme, character development, structure, symbolism, narration, language, and so forth Conclusion Keep a fundamental focus on the artist of the work, not just the elements of analysis as explained in the body Offer a conclusion that explores the contributions of the artist in accord with your thesis sentence Paradigm for Argument and Persuasion Papers If you write persuasively or argue from a set position, your paper should conform in general to this paradigm: Introduction In one statement establish the problem or controversial issue that your paper will examine Summarize the issues Make concessions on some points of the argument Use quotations and paraphrases to clarify the controversial nature of the subject Provide background information to relate the past to the present Write a thesis to establish your position Body Develop arguments to defend one side of the subject Analyze the issues, both pro and con Give evidence from the sources, including quotations as appropriate Conclusion Expand your thesis into a conclusion that makes clear your position, which should be one that grows logically from your analysis and discussion of the issues Paradigm for Historical Analysis If you are writing a historical or political science paper that analyzes events and their causes and consequences, your paper should conform in general to the following plan: Introduction Provide the background leading up to the event Offer quotations and paraphrases from experts Give the thesis sentence Analyze the background leading up to the event Trace events from one historic episode to another Offer a chronological sequence that explains how one event relates directly to the next Cite authorities who have also investigated this event in history Conclusion Discuss the consequences of this event, explaining how it altered the course of history Paradigm for a Comparative Study A comparative study requires you to examine two schools of thought, two issues, two works, or the positions taken by two persons.
The paper examines the similarities and differences of the two subjects, using one of three arrangements for the body of the paper:Goffman Unbound!: A New Paradigm for Social Science (The Sociological Imagination) [Thomas J.
Scheff, Bernard S Phillips, Harold Kincaid] on alphabetnyc.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
Thomas Scheff demonstrates why Goffman remains such a key figure for social scientists. Goffman may have been cautious about recognizing the role of .
A paradigm is a universal outline, one that governs most papers of a given type. It is not content-specific; rather, it provides a general model and a basic academic .
The Paleolithic Continuity Paradigm for the Origins of Indo-European Languages. Pragmatism is a deconstructive paradigm that advocates the use of mixed methods in research, “sidesteps the contentious issues of truth and reality” (Feilzer , p.
Client-Server. The first constraints added to our hybrid style are those of the client-server architectural style (), described in Section Separation of concerns is the principle behind the client-server constraints. I have put together this post to explain what a research paradigm is, which includes ontology, epistemology, theoretical framework and methodology, and why it is important for your research or PhD.